487 核撃てば尊師 (sage) 2014/01/15(水) 13:16:16 ID:Gw4K8KEw
it is clear to have mentioned and carried out defamation of the personal name -- if the excuse of there being no telling whether to be a thing of a victim's actual existence by post-installation by it, and not knowing a noise of what J is allowed, it will be a lawless area of an ant anything.
To put it bluntly, it writes in, and anything, there is also no opinion counterargument of the Lord or a defender and it does not go beyond the quibbling.
it is where the write-in Lord (>>204) does not have better to come out and apologize -- recognize a crime firmly.
What J of now which says clearly, borrows 威 of anonymity and depreciates an individual irresponsibly is unusual.
It desires eagerly for this affair to be published, and to write in by reporting in real name, for a person to examine himself, and for a copycat criminal to stop being.